The Origins of Grammar: An Anthropological Perspective
Format: PDF / Kindle (mobi) / ePub
Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics is one of the major theological works of the 20th century. The Swiss-German theologian Karl Barth (1886-1968) was the most original and significant Reformed theologian of the twentieth century. Barth began the Church Dogmatics in 1932 and continued working on its thirteen volumes until the end of his life. Barth's writings continue to guide and instruct the preaching and teaching of pastors and academics worldwide. The English translation was prepared by a team of scholars and edited by G. W. Bromiley and T. F. Torrance and published from 1936. A team of scholars at Princeton Theological Seminary have now provided the translation of Greek, Latin, Hebrew and French passages into English. The original is presented alongside the English translation. This makes the work more reader friendly and accessible to the growing number of students who do not have a working knowledge of the ancient languages. This new edition with translations is now available for the first time in individual volumes.
that faces generativists: how can a complex, innate system like language come into being as an integrated system in a Darwinian universe? The first approach is to formulate language origins as a continuous evolutionary event, with a smooth and steady transition from general communication to language throughout human species development. Each small increment in language capacity is selected for by the (arguable) fact that language in any form is an advantageous thing to have (Pinker, 1994, p.
In the construct give me a drink, please, the theme is giving, establishing a task-related intention to the utterance. Compare this to please may I have a drink, which requests the receiver to satisfy the sender’s need rather than just perform an act. Drink, please emphasizes the object itself rather than the action or the sender’s needs. Interpersonally, the first construct establishes the receiver in the role of servant to the sender, the second places them more equally as working in a joint
Cognitive grammar is internal to the individual mind, so idiosyncrasies are significant only if they advantage or disadvantage the individual; in contrast, any idiosyncrasies in communicative grammar must be capable of interpretation by other minds, which imposes limits on expressive difference. We can state uncontroversially that cognitive grammar preceded communicative grammar. In the model proposed here, the forms of cognition required by social modelling calculus must prefigure the forms
direction, and will look at the objects being attended to by others. Additionally, they are learning that the world can be affected remotely if they can recruit the muscle-power of others. CO22552.indb 121 23/04/2010 14:13 122 th e orig in s of g r am mar By eighteen months the child is usually aware that the usefulness of others can be variable—sometimes they will help, other times not. The child is also beginning to understand that others may not know everything the child knows, so
early language comprehension. Cambridge, Mass., USA: MIT Press. Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. (2009). The Super-Organism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. London, UK: W W Norton & co. Hopkins, W. D. & Pilcher, D. L. (2001). “Neuroanatomical Localization of the Motor Hand Area With Magnetic Resonance Imaging: The Left Hemisphere Is Larger in Great Apes”. Behavioral Neuroscience 115–5: pp. 1159–1164. Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge,