The Roman Empire: Economy, Society and Culture

The Roman Empire: Economy, Society and Culture

Language: English

Pages: 328

ISBN: 0520285980

Format: PDF / Kindle (mobi) / ePub


During the Principate (roughly 27 BCE to 235 CE), when the empire reached its maximum extent, Roman society and culture were radically transformed. But how was the vast territory of the empire controlled? Did the demands of central government stimulate economic growth or endanger survival? What forces of cohesion operated to balance the social and economic inequalities and high mortality rates? How did the official religion react in the face of the diffusion of alien cults and the emergence of Christianity?

These are some of the many questions posed here, in the new, expanded edition of Garnsey and Saller's pathbreaking account of the economy, society, and culture of the Roman Empire. This second edition includes a new introduction that explores the consequences for government and the governing classes of the replacement of the Republic by the rule of emperors. Addenda to the original chapters offer up-to-date discussions of issues and point to new evidence and approaches that have enlivened the study of Roman history in recent decades. A completely new chapter assesses how far Rome’s subjects resisted her hegemony. The bibliography has also been thoroughly updated, and a new color plate section has been added.

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Capitalism

Beyond a House Divided: The Moral Consensus Ignored by Washington, Wall Street, and the Media

Identity, Segregation and Peace-Building in Northern Ireland: A Social Psychological Perspective

Uncharitable: How Restraints on Nonprofits Undermine Their Potential

Waking from the Dream: The Struggle for Civil Rights in the Shadow of Martin Luther King, Jr.

Exploring Civil Society: Political and Cultural Contexts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

benefactors. There are signs that profiteering in essential foodstuffs became more common than in the past, and that local government was less able to control it and more ready to seek outside intervention. These were ominous developments, but local patriotism was seriously undermined not by the normal operation of Roman government under the Principate, but by the collapse of central authority combined with chronic insecurity in the localities in the mid-third century. III Augustus restored

Epicurean. London Hill, H. (1969) ‘Nobilitas in the imperial period’, Historia 18: 230–50 Hobson, D.W. (1985) ‘House and Household in Roman Egypt’, YCS 28: 211–29 Hopkins, K. (1965a) ‘Age of Roman girls at marriage’, Population Studies 18: 309–27 Hopkins, K. (1965b) ‘Contraception in the Roman empire’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 8: 124–51 Hopkins, K. (1966) ‘On the probable age structure of the Roman population’, Population Studies 20: 245–64 Hopkins, K. (1974) ‘Elite

Woolf, G. (1990) ‘Food, poverty and patronage: the significance of the epigraphy of the Roman alimentary schemes in early imperial Italy’, PBSR 58: 197–228 Woolf, G. (1992) ‘Imperialism, empire and the integration of the Roman economy’, World Archaelogy 23: 283–93 Woolf, G. (1994) ‘Becoming Roman, staying Greek: culture, identity and the civilizing process in the Roman East’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 40: 116–43 Woolf, G. (1996) ‘The uses of forgetfulness in Roman

Rome from Gaul, the Chersonese, Cyprus and Spain. Pliny was not presenting a list, and if he had been, it is not complete. But in any case, the burden was shared unevenly among this latter group and the main suppliers.21 The unevenness of the division becomes clear if we inquire into the status of the grain coming to Rome. The group of main suppliers provided the tax-grain (plus the bulk of the grain that came in through supplementary tax, requisitioning and compulsory purchase), the single most

(1996). For slaves in agriculture, see Chapter 6 Addendum. The monograph of Mouritsen (2011a) fills a large gap in recent scholarship on freedmen. Junian Latins, that is, ex-slaves freed informally, have attracted an increasing amount of attention. It seems agreed that they were a numerically significant group among freedmen. Their identification in inscriptions, however, remains problematic, as they carry no distinctive onomastic markers. See Sirks (1981, 1983), Weaver (1990, 1997), López Barja

Download sample

Download

About admin