The Philosophy of Husserl (Continental European Philosophy)
Burt C. Hopkins
Language: English
Pages: 304
ISBN: 0773538232
Format: PDF / Kindle (mobi) / ePub
Philosophical Works of Etienne Bonnot, Abbe De Condillac, Volume 2
Second, the eide¯ themselves are bifurcated into the sensible eide¯ proper to determinate sensible things and the “one in kind [eidei]” (429b28) eide¯ proper to intelligible things. Third, because the intelligible things are in the sensible eide¯, the thinking (theorein) that beholds intelligible things must “behold at the same time some phantasma” (432a9) of a sensible eidos, for “it is not possible even to think (noein) without a phantasma” (Mem. 449b33). And fourth, nous becomes the eidos of
trees”, “three” has the same status as the “white”; the definite amount of trees, namely, “three”, therefore has no proper “nature [phusis]” (M 6, 1080a15, 1082a16; 8, 1083b22). The being so many of trees, like their being green, is dependent on there being trees. The “being three” of three trees therefore cannot be independent of the trees whose amount is “three”. For Aristotle, then, the status of the being of numbers is determined by their natural meaning: the assertion that certain things are
self-understanding – punctuated a lifetime lived in the service of his science. In what follows, then, Husserl’s phenomenology will be introduced starting from the articulation of its mature formulation, in the course of which the development that led to this formulation will be systematically treated and laid out in detail. Pure phenomenology’s most basic principles: presuppositionlessness, pure reflection, essential intuition The mature statement of Husserl’s phenomenology (its fourth and
the contemporary (to him) perception of the crisis in the sciences. This perception is based on two considerations: first, that neither the natural nor human sciences are able to speak to the vital needs of the human being, needs that concern the whole of human existence and especially questions pertaining to its meaning and meaninglessness; and second, that both science and reason in themselves are intrinsically limited in their ability to provide tuition that speaks to these needs. Hence
and, finally, for the “experience of the alien (Fremderfahrung)” (CM, 156). In the latter case, a combination comes about between the concrete Ego, together with his primordial 168 T H E I N T E R S U B J E C T I V E F O U N DAT I O N O F T R A N S C E N D E N TA L I D E A L I S M sphere, and “the alien sphere represented therein”. This combination first accomplishes the identifying synthesis of the primordially given lived-body of someone else and the same body, “but appresented in other